I often say that making code do one thing is easy, but making it do lots of things at once is hard. You especially see this in UI code, although it happens on the back end too. The worst of all is front-end web development, where so many things are outside your control.
For example, a customer asks to add a real-time “suggestions” feature to a search box, so that as users type they see possible things to search for. That’s pretty easy, until you think about all the details you have to support:
I’m not saying it’s reasonable to do all these things every time. You may have customers for whom supporting Arabic and Chinese is a waste of money. I didn’t even list the things users will ask for that are just crazy! I did throw in “search box inside a dropdown menu” to give you a mild taste, and I may have included others that are … questionable. But you have to at least think about them.
In any case, there is a lot to get right, and these details are the difference between polished and unpolished. I learned early in my career that if I deliver something where a few details are still not quite right, I will surely get caught and have to fix it, and the customer will be a lot happier if they never see the broken version in the first place. Polish takes time, but it is still required.
The problem is that completing the list gets harder and harder as you approach the end. No item by itself is hard, but adding the next item without breaking the others is hard. In relativity, accerlating at high velocity takes more energy than accelerating the same amount at low velocity, and the energy to reach
c is infinite. Web development has a similar law: requirement
n + 1 costs more than requirement
n. Adding an ellpisis isn’t hard. Adding it in right-to-left text with an Arabic font on IE 6 in quirks mode when the user has large text enabled is hard.
And now, just to draw one more connection: one thing you learn from experience is ruthless simplification, and skepticism toward adding “concepts” to your app. If you have
n features, and they all interact, the complexity grows not by
O(n^2). I’ve talked mostly about front-end work, but I think it is the same everywhere, and we just see it more on the front end because there it is so unavoidable. Some of it is multiple browsers, some of it is features users expect from any UI, but there our
n is already high before we even do anything. In our own feature design we can at least be ruthless. On the front end, we just have to keep polishing. It makes me pity people who sell Wordpress plugins for a living.
As much as you can, it pays off tremendously to manage the combinatorial explosion. You can limit scope, you can stop supporting old browsers. You can design components to be isolated, since if they don’t interact they don’t raise each other’s
n. Somehow you have to keep that number under control. The good news is that the marginal benefit of cutting
n is large.
You can also write tests, which let you tolerate a higher
n by making it less expensive to test in an
n^2 world. Sadly browser tests are the most expensive to write, the most brittle (i.e. the shortest-lived), and the longest to run, but still I am always glad to have them.
I guess I have written myself into two morals here. One is: don’t permit any more complexity than you have to. The second is: sometimes you just have to keep polishing, also known as “That’s why they call it work!” Painfully, these really tug you in different directions. Choosing when to apply them is not easy.
Good luck!blog comments powered by Disqus Next: Scaling Sidekiq